Below I reposted my interpretation of the article from DTC 475, as I still feel the same. However, I added an additional section at the end.
I viewed the cataloging of rhetoric as dry and unfulfilling. However, I gained a greater grasp of the meaning of rhetoric through modern day examples and direct definitions given at the beginning of the article. What helped me in particular was the examples of how situations today can be rhetorical, "is someone an alcoholic or morally depraved? Is a child misbehaved or unable to concentrate because of an attention deficit disorder?" (Foss, Fossm and Trapp 2). To that end, does a chronological explanation of rhetoric provide clarity of its meaning or do examples of modern rhetorical situations provide clarity? While all the information in the article is relevant to the subject, its relevance to the individual may vary.
I sincerely hope I am understanding this concept of rhetoric correctly! If not, please let me know!
As a cell phone owner, user and texter, I am automatically entered into a realm of digital rhetoric. When texting, one must interpret typed words from the perspective of a "cell phone user". If your friend texts you, "I WILL BE THERE SOON" - it could be interpreted as an angry text (because of the upper-case letters), or it could be interpreted as a mistake (he/she must have accidentally had Caps Lock on) or it could be interpreted as urgent (urgency to be there soon marked by the upper-case letters), etc. The upper-case letters are the symbols with which we are interpreting the message. These interpretation of this symbol could be affected by; mood, time of day, relationship with the sender, place, etc.
Other symbols related to texting include; emoticons, acronyms, and picture/video texts. Each of these represent symbols to be interpreted by the receiver.
2) Google definitions:
"Rhetoric can describe a persuasive way in which one relates a theme or idea in an effort to convince" (WordIQ Dictionary)
"Cicero: Rhetoric is "speech designed to persuade" (Stanford University).
2) Google definitions:
"Rhetoric can describe a persuasive way in which one relates a theme or idea in an effort to convince" (WordIQ Dictionary)
"Cicero: Rhetoric is "speech designed to persuade" (Stanford University).
3) I began reading this article while my boyfriend was sitting next to me and I said aloud, "hey, I've already read this article!" He asked me what it was about and I said, "rhetoric". He asked me what "rhetoric" is. I looked around his room in search of an example I could illustrate. I stood up and pointed to his Avengers Invader
poster. "What do you notice about all of the male characters in this poster?" I asked him. His immediate response was, "they are all visibly muscular and fit". Precisely! I began to explain that the muscularity of the male figures in the poster was a form of rhetoric. The muscles are SYMBOLIC of the 'masculinity' or 'manliness' that are seemingly expected of superheroes. The muscularity can affect the viewers perception of what a"superhero" should look like. If a male superhero is pudgy or very thin, does it make him less powerful or 'cool'? To that end, if the average MALE isn't muscular, is he less of a man?Perhaps my example was off the mark a bit - I am unsure. Please, let me know though!
Works Cited
Foss, Sonja K., Karen A. Foss, and Robert Trapp. Prespective on Rhetoric. 3rd ed. Waveland Press INC., 1-9. Print.
"A Few Definitions of Rhetoric." Stanford University. Web. 12 Jan. 2011. <http://www.stanford.edu/dept/english/courses/sites/lunsford/pages/defs.htm>.
"Rhetoric - Definition." Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus - WordIQ Dictionary. Web. 12 Jan. 2011. <http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Rhetoric>.
"A Few Definitions of Rhetoric." Stanford University. Web. 12 Jan. 2011. <http://www.stanford.edu/dept/english/courses/sites/lunsford/pages/defs.htm>.
"Rhetoric - Definition." Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus - WordIQ Dictionary. Web. 12 Jan. 2011. <http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Rhetoric>.
Fun read! I really liked the exploration of comics--don't remember this from last time. I wonder what your analysis means for women superheroes. Do they have similar sorts of representations?
ReplyDelete